When commenting about
the challenge of keeping Iran from developing nuclear weapons and
America's promise(!) to not let that happen, President Obama said a
few days ago that "I am not a bluffer!". Are you kidding
me?
Based on President
Obama's campaign promises (most of which went unfulfilled) one could
easily justify labelling him The Bluffer-In-Chief
because he didn't keep his word on most
of his promises
... to his own citizens!. And he now expects us and Israel to believe
that we can
trust his promise to keep Iran from developing nuclear weapons! C'mon
folks! Does it make more sense to base our belief whether he's
bluffing on words or on his historical lack of action on previous
promises?
IMPORTANT
QUESTION:
If you were Israel's leader would you (based on President Obama's
actual track record) trust President Obama's promises when your
country's very
existence
depended on it?
President Obama's
campaign promises didn't become truth so were they lies or bluffs or
naivete? If naivete is the reason, isn't it likely that he's being
naive now and will back down to Iran when real
consequences
loom? If his campaign promises were lies or bluffs, that's no better
than naivete is it? Regardless how one dissects President Obama's
latest not-a-bluffer
claim, his record (assuming actual facts matter to you) is one of not
doing much of what he says he'll do. If
you were Netanyahu, what would you think and do? Be honest now!
No comments:
Post a Comment